We were just forwarded this by a reader and thought some others may want the chance at it. Our favorite quote, which shouldn’t go un-noticed simply for the fact that the mainstream media is saying it, “…because you thought the real estate market had peaked.” We assume this means others are catching on to what we’ve been saying for months.
Did you turn down the chance to buy a $250,000 Sunset fixer some years ago, and now kick yourself because the same house is worth $1 million? Did you sell your home in 1998 and switch to renting because you thought the real-estate market had peaked?
We’re looking for Bay Area residents’ tales of real-estate regrets — the “shoulda, coulda, woulda” scenarios. With the benefit of hindsight, are there specific local properties you wish you had bought — or sold — a few years ago?
If you care to comment, please address the following question:
“What real-estate deal — one you made or one you didn’t make — do you kick yourself over? Please be specific as possible about the type of house you passed up.
Responses are due by 10 a.m. Tuesday, May 29. Please include your name and the name of the town you live in with your answer.
Answers — which will run only if space permits — should be 50 words or less and are subject to editing. Those selected for publication will run with the correspondent’s photo, name and the name of the town where he or she lives. The column will also run on our Web site, www.sfgate.com.
It’s also possible that a reporter will quote some answers in a related story, so please be sure to include your name and a daytime contact number with your answer.
Send your emails to: [email protected]
–Is what we’ve been saying for months finally catching on? [sfn BLOG]
–More Doom and Gloom, but is it the best way to think? [sfn BLOG]
5 thoughts on “Your chance at fame…or missed fortune.”
This will be an interesting column when it finally airs.
April’s zip code prices out. Looks pretty darn good in some areas, and not so good in others.
First of all I love this blog. It’s good for a laugh more days then not.
Second of all I can’t wait to read the column you guys seem to think is coming in 2014: “I could have bought that fixer upper in the sunset for a mere million in 2007… now it’s selling for four million”. ROFLMAO! You have any idea what kind of wage growth we’ll need to see in order for people to even make their mortgage? But who knows maybe brokers will start introducing 100 year mortgages like they did in Japan before the housing crash there…
Finally thanks for the dq numbers boom. With such a small data set it’s hard to draw firm conclusions but one fact stands out above all others: If the median dropped, the number of sales significantly increased. Likewise if the median price increased, the number of sales slowed substantially. The difference in sales volume growth between the two groups is impressive: it’s about a 45 percent spread.
As a result I think realtors would be wise to exert some downward pressure on their clients asking price, as they are going to make more money selling lots of houses with smaller commissions then sitting around for months waiting for that one big fish to come in.
Ah Boom – Frankly, I do believe in 7 years time, people will be kicking themselves thinking how could they let that $1.5 million fixer slip away. People are kicking themselves now for not buying last fall, and two years ago. It just goes on and on again.
I never would have imagined a SFH Marina row house not off Marina Blvd/PalaceFA could break $2.5 mil 2 years ago, and it did. This year, 3321 Octavia breaks $3.5 mil to $3.7 mil, and now we have this 1771
FranciscoNorth Point house asking $4.995 mil?! The plot of land has not changed, yes the houses have grown, but wow.
I would never EVER have imagined Marina SFHs would break $3million by 2010. Boy was I wrong.
Median family income in SF in 1997: $64,400
Median price of a 3BR house in SF in 1997: $311k
Median family income in SF in 2007: $86,500
Median price of a 3BR house in SF in 2007: $1,000,000.
This isn’t sustainable. Assuming wage growth remains relatively stagnant compared to housing prices, you quickly start to run out of individuals wealthy enough to afford a home long before you reach the proverbial $5 million fixer upper in the Sunset.
Even as it is, roughly 60% of the city could only afford to purchase their home thanks to an option ARM. As those start to reset over the next year or two you got a problem, and even a little bump in interest rates could turn this problem into a massive one.
According to DQ prices are up, but volume is nearing a ten year low. In DQ’s words this is a standoff between buyer and seller. This is going to be interesting, because neither side can afford to blink, but only one side has anything to lose. That, to me, does not suggest we are going to be seeing annual increases in the 10-12% range.