<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texting + Driving = NO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/10/21/texting-driving-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/10/21/texting-driving-no/</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Insight, Statistics, Gossip, &#38; News...With a Twist and Some Flavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoegaarden</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/10/21/texting-driving-no/comment-page-1/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>hoegaarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/?p=2617#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re piloting 2 tons of machinery capable of all sorts of mayhem and harm it makes sense to take a professional attitude to avoid collisions.  That means focusing your attention to the task of driving.

This is actually a case of liberty being curtailed in order to increase freedom.  Specifically eliminating the liberty to text while driving improves the freedom from being maimed or killed by a distracted driver.

Both liberty and freedom are American values and often conflicts arise.  In this case lawmakers are valuing people&#039;s safety over their ability to multitask.  I think that&#039;s the right priorities.

But it&#039;s not surprising that some people take a &quot;me first&quot; view and don&#039;t value the safety of those outside of their car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re piloting 2 tons of machinery capable of all sorts of mayhem and harm it makes sense to take a professional attitude to avoid collisions.  That means focusing your attention to the task of driving.</p>
<p>This is actually a case of liberty being curtailed in order to increase freedom.  Specifically eliminating the liberty to text while driving improves the freedom from being maimed or killed by a distracted driver.</p>
<p>Both liberty and freedom are American values and often conflicts arise.  In this case lawmakers are valuing people&#8217;s safety over their ability to multitask.  I think that&#8217;s the right priorities.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not surprising that some people take a &#8220;me first&#8221; view and don&#8217;t value the safety of those outside of their car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon8mizer</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/10/21/texting-driving-no/comment-page-1/#comment-6219</link>
		<dc:creator>anon8mizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/?p=2617#comment-6219</guid>
		<description>The best video to highlight the brilliance of such laws. It&#039;s totally worth a gawk.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaNahxluC5I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best video to highlight the brilliance of such laws. It&#8217;s totally worth a gawk.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaNahxluC5I" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaNahxluC5I</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

