[Editor's note: Don't know. LOL! Just Kidding. San Mateo County...think Daly City. Check this map.]

Does anyone know if the number withdrawn is very high or the number going into contract is very different from the number sold. Assuming it’s the latter, it would be very interesting to know if the ratio of number “sold” to number clearing escrow has changed in the last year.

which is why I asked. Its easy for one months figures to be affected my mix, particularly for just one district with 20 or so sales. d9 will have alot of variety in the type/quality of house I guess.

Where? What? We just saw a house on Folsom and 21st get into contract instantly for at least $1.475M. What I’m seeing is that any good Mission house is gone in a few weeks. That’s something that has really blown my mind, to be honest. You would think the Mission would be suffering at this stage.

I look at Bernal Heights right now and I don’t see a single house for sale that’s in the “best of Bernal.” I can elaborate on that if you like.

Potrero Hill? We can examine each of the six SFRs on the market if you like. Instead I suggest watching what happens with 958 Carolina street. It will be interesting to follow because it’s a great house on the wrong side of the hill. Another one to watch over there is 2145 18th. They’re asking $2.145 for 18th and Vermont.

But back to the data – we know d10 has been bad for a while but this month looks really bad for d9. The first time I think its been the case.

A one off blip or have things really turned bad there? I mean, its down over 20% YOY..

lost 100k.”

Lots of different maths going on here. Your “math” is based on the following pre-supposition: the home where we assume the people reside was purchased in 2005-2007, and is on the market now. Most people look at longer time horizons when they buy r.e. in which they actually reside. Think five to 10 years, minimum, not one to three.