<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zanic! Zillow releases Q4 Home Value Report and San Francisco is up 3.6%?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Insight, Statistics, Gossip, and News - with a Twist and some Flavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hangemhi</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-8796</link>
		<dc:creator>hangemhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-8796</guid>
		<description>or put another way.... &quot;39% of the time we are no where near the real price&quot;.  Zillow is better than a sharp stick in the eye, but even being off by 5% doesn&#039;t help that much IMO.

besides... that&#039;s plus or minus 5% right?  so it&#039;s really a 10% range when they are doing well, a 20% range &quot;on the majority&quot; and lord knows what kind of range on the 39% that is probably your home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or put another way&#8230;. &#8220;39% of the time we are no where near the real price&#8221;.  Zillow is better than a sharp stick in the eye, but even being off by 5% doesn&#8217;t help that much IMO.</p>
<p>besides&#8230; that&#8217;s plus or minus 5% right?  so it&#8217;s really a 10% range when they are doing well, a 20% range &#8220;on the majority&#8221; and lord knows what kind of range on the 39% that is probably your home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Warhurst</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4121</link>
		<dc:creator>William Warhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4121</guid>
		<description>I note this comment in the Los Angeles Times explained one of the many ways that Zillow estimates may be far off -- inadequate consideration of lot size. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/04/the-foreclosure.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note this comment in the Los Angeles Times explained one of the many ways that Zillow estimates may be far off &#8212; inadequate consideration of lot size. <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/04/the-foreclosure.html" rel="nofollow">http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/04/the-foreclosure.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoomTime</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4122</link>
		<dc:creator>BoomTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4122</guid>
		<description>Is there an actual link from SFGATE or ZILLOW that breaksdown price increases/decreases by ZIP CODE?  That&#039;s what The Chronicle seems to imply in its article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an actual link from SFGATE or ZILLOW that breaksdown price increases/decreases by ZIP CODE?  That&#8217;s what The Chronicle seems to imply in its article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4123</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4123</guid>
		<description>what did you do sleepiguy?  paint it bright purple?



;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what did you do sleepiguy?  paint it bright purple?</p>
<p> <img src='http://thefrontsteps.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleepiguy</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleepiguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>I stopped paying attention to Zillow when my home&#039;s Zillow value decreased randomly by $600k one week while my neighbor&#039;s houses showed significant increases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped paying attention to Zillow when my home&#8217;s Zillow value decreased randomly by $600k one week while my neighbor&#8217;s houses showed significant increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G from Zillow.com</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>David G from Zillow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>Thanks James!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks James!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>hey david,



i&#039;ve found that your estimates have been getting better of the years.  you seem to be getting closer to city appraised values vs what the market might pay for something.  i think that is far more valuable in the long run.



keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey david,</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve found that your estimates have been getting better of the years.  you seem to be getting closer to city appraised values vs what the market might pay for something.  i think that is far more valuable in the long run.</p>
<p>keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G from Zillow.com</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/02/12/zanic-zillow-releases-q4-home-value-report-and-san-francisco-is-up-36/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>David G from Zillow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1315#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>Hi, it&#039;s David from Zillow,



Just to clarify; the photo shows the most popular home in the city (as measured by page views on Zillow), not the &quot;average&quot; home. Regardless, it&#039;s good feedback that you were expecting to see an image of an average home - I&#039;ll pass it on.



William Warhurst must have been looking at some pretty weird appraisals when he reached those conclusions. In reality, most (61%) of the Zestimate values in San Francisco are within 10% of sales price - and 35% are within 5%. You should absolutely consult a local expert when deciding on a list price or what to offer but for researching home values, Zillow&#039;s a good starting point.



[&lt;strong&gt;Editor&#039;s note&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for the clarification.  I&#039;ll put this on the post.  Glad to see you&#039;re reading.  Now about a link on your blog. ;-) ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it&#8217;s David from Zillow,</p>
<p>Just to clarify; the photo shows the most popular home in the city (as measured by page views on Zillow), not the &#8220;average&#8221; home. Regardless, it&#8217;s good feedback that you were expecting to see an image of an average home &#8211; I&#8217;ll pass it on.</p>
<p>William Warhurst must have been looking at some pretty weird appraisals when he reached those conclusions. In reality, most (61%) of the Zestimate values in San Francisco are within 10% of sales price &#8211; and 35% are within 5%. You should absolutely consult a local expert when deciding on a list price or what to offer but for researching home values, Zillow&#8217;s a good starting point.</p>
<p>[<strong>Editor's note</strong>: Thanks for the clarification.  I'll put this on the post.  Glad to see you're reading.  Now about a link on your blog. <img src='http://thefrontsteps.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
