<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resetting DOM (Days On Market), Buyers speak up! ABC News Nightline is listening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Insight, Statistics, Gossip, &#38; News...With a Twist and Some Flavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-2/#comment-3988</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3988</guid>
		<description>In San Mateo County they run two clocks  DOM and CDOM, or continuous days on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In San Mateo County they run two clocks  DOM and CDOM, or continuous days on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paco</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-2/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>buyers want accuracy in DOM listing b/c they want to beat the price down.  if they cannot admit this they are only fooling themselves.  if you want the place then figure out your price and bid.



  if you are looking in SF its not too hard to keep current b/c there is so little inventory.  buyers are frustrated by the prices and will whine about every sort of issue but that will not bring the prices down.  that&#039;s the job of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buyers want accuracy in DOM listing b/c they want to beat the price down.  if they cannot admit this they are only fooling themselves.  if you want the place then figure out your price and bid.</p>
<p>  if you are looking in SF its not too hard to keep current b/c there is so little inventory.  buyers are frustrated by the prices and will whine about every sort of issue but that will not bring the prices down.  that&#8217;s the job of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-2/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>a 2 bedroom in my building just sold after 26 days on the market for 1.332 million.  i have serious reservations about that dom figure however.  the best part about it, they marketed it as a 3 bedroom.



;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 2 bedroom in my building just sold after 26 days on the market for 1.332 million.  i have serious reservations about that dom figure however.  the best part about it, they marketed it as a 3 bedroom.</p>
<p> <img src='http://thefrontsteps.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryinPalosVerdes</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3989</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryinPalosVerdes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3989</guid>
		<description>Being New on the Market benefits Who?   IF a buyer is looking long and hard they are well aware of how long that property has been on the market.

If the Buyer has just come on the market and wants to make an offer on that property, they usually want to know how long it has been on the market?  This will affect the offering price to the Seller. If the Buyer has just come on the seen and thinks the property has just come on the market, in my experience they will be willing to make a higher and faster offer than a property that the Buyer thinks has sat on the market for a long time.

In my board in Palos Verdes, Calif. I am able to search the history of a property on the MLS.  That way I can see how long the property has really been on the market. At least for Palos Verdes California, You can not hide the days on the market even if it says new.  So just have your agent do their homework and New on the Market is no longer an issue in the Los Angeles Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being New on the Market benefits Who?   IF a buyer is looking long and hard they are well aware of how long that property has been on the market.</p>
<p>If the Buyer has just come on the market and wants to make an offer on that property, they usually want to know how long it has been on the market?  This will affect the offering price to the Seller. If the Buyer has just come on the seen and thinks the property has just come on the market, in my experience they will be willing to make a higher and faster offer than a property that the Buyer thinks has sat on the market for a long time.</p>
<p>In my board in Palos Verdes, Calif. I am able to search the history of a property on the MLS.  That way I can see how long the property has really been on the market. At least for Palos Verdes California, You can not hide the days on the market even if it says new.  So just have your agent do their homework and New on the Market is no longer an issue in the Los Angeles Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patient Buyer</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3986</link>
		<dc:creator>Patient Buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3986</guid>
		<description>Totally unethical!



DOM manipulation gets rolled up in the local and national housing statistics so who knows what the real market status is?!?!



If its taken off the market for 6 months to a year or more, and something REAL done to change the property, that&#039;s one thing.  But a month or two?  No way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally unethical!</p>
<p>DOM manipulation gets rolled up in the local and national housing statistics so who knows what the real market status is?!?!</p>
<p>If its taken off the market for 6 months to a year or more, and something REAL done to change the property, that&#8217;s one thing.  But a month or two?  No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Altos Dave</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Altos Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>My 2 Cents



I agree with most of what has been written.  However,  buyers and sellers both place too much emphasis on the DOM or CDOM.  As mentioned above, DOM or CDOM is probably the least informative of the MLS data points.  The data tells everyone how long a listing has been on the MLS.  Nothin&#039; more and nothin&#039; less.  It doesn&#039;t tell how long it has been a pocket listing etc. (ie. on Craigs list, sing on front law indicating future listing &quot;coming soon&quot; etc.) It doesn&#039;t tell whether there has been a price adjustment and it certainly doesn&#039;t determine the value of the home.  Its a data point that some (data geeks) use in an effort to have a measure of control over the purchase decision.   Ie. if the home has been on the market for 90 days, it must be due a 5% drop.  If it has been on the market for 120 days, an 8% drop and so on.



Locally (and I imagine throughout the greater planet know as Earth), unscrupulous, unethical or poorly trained (ignorant?) agents use these tactics to create what the agent perceives as &quot;new interest&quot; in a property.  In a warped sense they are acting as a fiduciary for their client by trying to keep the house in front of buyers in hope of getting the home sold.  The reality is that any buyer who has been following the market (and if your buying a home and not following the market, shame on you) to any degree (either with or without an agent) would know that the home in question is being &quot;gamed&quot; by the listing agent.  For the casual observer, the DOM or CDOM might confuse.  It is unfortunate that some MLS&#039;s don&#039;t publish the CDOM data to the public.  But even if they did, the value of DOM or CDOM is minor.



One issue not mentioned is the seller has ultimate authority for the list price.  Seller&#039;s may want to &quot;test the market&quot; with a higher price.  The listing agent needs to fully explain the pros and cons of such a strategy.  Unfortunately, some agents may take an overpriced listing just to get the listing and then try to &quot;assist the seller&quot; in pricing the home correctly while the home sits and gets &quot;stale.&quot;  New agents and agents of dubious ethics use this tactic to get listings.  Any seasoned agent knows that this is a bad idea and against a Realtors code of ethics (yes we have a code of ethics).  Note: not all licensed real estate agents belong to the California Association of Realtors, so those who aren&#039;t CAR members are difficult to discipline for ethics violations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2 Cents</p>
<p>I agree with most of what has been written.  However,  buyers and sellers both place too much emphasis on the DOM or CDOM.  As mentioned above, DOM or CDOM is probably the least informative of the MLS data points.  The data tells everyone how long a listing has been on the MLS.  Nothin&#8217; more and nothin&#8217; less.  It doesn&#8217;t tell how long it has been a pocket listing etc. (ie. on Craigs list, sing on front law indicating future listing &#8220;coming soon&#8221; etc.) It doesn&#8217;t tell whether there has been a price adjustment and it certainly doesn&#8217;t determine the value of the home.  Its a data point that some (data geeks) use in an effort to have a measure of control over the purchase decision.   Ie. if the home has been on the market for 90 days, it must be due a 5% drop.  If it has been on the market for 120 days, an 8% drop and so on.</p>
<p>Locally (and I imagine throughout the greater planet know as Earth), unscrupulous, unethical or poorly trained (ignorant?) agents use these tactics to create what the agent perceives as &#8220;new interest&#8221; in a property.  In a warped sense they are acting as a fiduciary for their client by trying to keep the house in front of buyers in hope of getting the home sold.  The reality is that any buyer who has been following the market (and if your buying a home and not following the market, shame on you) to any degree (either with or without an agent) would know that the home in question is being &#8220;gamed&#8221; by the listing agent.  For the casual observer, the DOM or CDOM might confuse.  It is unfortunate that some MLS&#8217;s don&#8217;t publish the CDOM data to the public.  But even if they did, the value of DOM or CDOM is minor.</p>
<p>One issue not mentioned is the seller has ultimate authority for the list price.  Seller&#8217;s may want to &#8220;test the market&#8221; with a higher price.  The listing agent needs to fully explain the pros and cons of such a strategy.  Unfortunately, some agents may take an overpriced listing just to get the listing and then try to &#8220;assist the seller&#8221; in pricing the home correctly while the home sits and gets &#8220;stale.&#8221;  New agents and agents of dubious ethics use this tactic to get listings.  Any seasoned agent knows that this is a bad idea and against a Realtors code of ethics (yes we have a code of ethics).  Note: not all licensed real estate agents belong to the California Association of Realtors, so those who aren&#8217;t CAR members are difficult to discipline for ethics violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>In my opinion this practice is aimed squarely at other realtors in the first place, not the consumer. I&#039;m only speaking of SF, because that&#039;s what I generally deal with. Here the object is to get the property back to the front of the tour sheet. A 5% price reduction or more will also merit that same status.



Most people need buyers agents. Some are equipped to handle it by themselves. But the sheer amount of things they need to do, let alone the data they need to review, is going to be prohibitive for most people. Now, if you have your mind made up you want to live in a certain building come hell or high water? Hey, maybe you should go for it solo.



There&#039;s also this, what if the market changes back to a completely balanced or even a buyer&#039;s market? All this bluster about DOM is going to fall by the wayside. If that should happens damn near every property is going to take a few months to sell. DOM won&#039;t be relevant at all. They&#039;ll all be at 60+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion this practice is aimed squarely at other realtors in the first place, not the consumer. I&#8217;m only speaking of SF, because that&#8217;s what I generally deal with. Here the object is to get the property back to the front of the tour sheet. A 5% price reduction or more will also merit that same status.</p>
<p>Most people need buyers agents. Some are equipped to handle it by themselves. But the sheer amount of things they need to do, let alone the data they need to review, is going to be prohibitive for most people. Now, if you have your mind made up you want to live in a certain building come hell or high water? Hey, maybe you should go for it solo.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also this, what if the market changes back to a completely balanced or even a buyer&#8217;s market? All this bluster about DOM is going to fall by the wayside. If that should happens damn near every property is going to take a few months to sell. DOM won&#8217;t be relevant at all. They&#8217;ll all be at 60+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>john juarez post brings up a personal problem i have with the industry at large.  why have two competing/conflicting parties involved in a transaction trying to deceive eachother.  maybe we should only have one realtor in a transaction, the sellers listing agent.  make them liable for anything they fail to disclose.  they do all the work anyway in getting listings.  they should be compensated, not the buyers agent.  this would reduce our transaction costs by 50% on deals.  with the advent of things like open mls and the internet, do we really need buyer agents anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john juarez post brings up a personal problem i have with the industry at large.  why have two competing/conflicting parties involved in a transaction trying to deceive eachother.  maybe we should only have one realtor in a transaction, the sellers listing agent.  make them liable for anything they fail to disclose.  they do all the work anyway in getting listings.  they should be compensated, not the buyers agent.  this would reduce our transaction costs by 50% on deals.  with the advent of things like open mls and the internet, do we really need buyer agents anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>hoegaardan - I agree 100% with you.  Of course I can dig through the property history and tell my buyers the actual number - but that&#039;s not the issue. The issue is why we continue to take the short cut - continue to act in a manner that is far from honest - and then hide behind the bullshit &lt;i&gt; &quot;It&#039;s not illegal&quot; &lt;/i&gt;line of reasoning.  It&#039;s a joke - it&#039;s why so many have ZERO trust in real estate agents and why so many call for radical changes to our industry.



If you change brokerages - the new brokerage should have a new days on market - in my opinion that&#039;s the only time it should reset.



If you want to pocket list a property, advertise for months on your own website, spam the hell out of Craigslist with advertisements about the property -- have at it.  But when you decide to put the unit in the MLS - be honest and ethical and enter it with the appropriate days on market.



What if I was to put a list of 10 properties on this site which have been pocket listed for 60+ days and ACTIVELY advertised on Craigslist as available - but are currently being marketed as &quot;new on the market&quot; in the MLS - What do you think the agents representing these properties would say, &lt;i&gt;&quot;It&#039;s not illegal - what am I doing wrong&quot; &lt;/i&gt;



Who knows - perhaps our Association will take action and even the playing field - force all of us to play by the rules and not manipulate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoegaardan &#8211; I agree 100% with you.  Of course I can dig through the property history and tell my buyers the actual number &#8211; but that&#8217;s not the issue. The issue is why we continue to take the short cut &#8211; continue to act in a manner that is far from honest &#8211; and then hide behind the bullshit <i> &#8220;It&#8217;s not illegal&#8221; </i>line of reasoning.  It&#8217;s a joke &#8211; it&#8217;s why so many have ZERO trust in real estate agents and why so many call for radical changes to our industry.</p>
<p>If you change brokerages &#8211; the new brokerage should have a new days on market &#8211; in my opinion that&#8217;s the only time it should reset.</p>
<p>If you want to pocket list a property, advertise for months on your own website, spam the hell out of Craigslist with advertisements about the property &#8212; have at it.  But when you decide to put the unit in the MLS &#8211; be honest and ethical and enter it with the appropriate days on market.</p>
<p>What if I was to put a list of 10 properties on this site which have been pocket listed for 60+ days and ACTIVELY advertised on Craigslist as available &#8211; but are currently being marketed as &#8220;new on the market&#8221; in the MLS &#8211; What do you think the agents representing these properties would say, <i>&#8220;It&#8217;s not illegal &#8211; what am I doing wrong&#8221; </i></p>
<p>Who knows &#8211; perhaps our Association will take action and even the playing field &#8211; force all of us to play by the rules and not manipulate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoegaarden</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2008/01/31/resetting-dom-days-on-market-buyers-speak-up-abc-news-nightline-is-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>hoegaarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>To those who suggest that it is in the best interest of sellers to reset DOM : if this practice were banned then the playing field would be leveled and there would be no need to play those games that just annoy buyers.  Banning deceptive relisting would bring clarity to the market and would put sellers who have nothing to hide and those that do have something to hide at the same advantage.  Why favor sellers who fool buyers ?  If you&#039;re interested in a fair market then who&#039;s interest is it to obscure information and encourage chicanery ?



To those who suggest that the status quo is just fine : just contract a knowledgeable realtor and they will release the &quot;real&quot; DOM figure : how does this benefit anyone in the market ?  We&#039;re just talking about a number.   A number that the sfarmls.com database could easily produce without the need to insert a realtor in the loop.  Certainly good realtors have better use of their time than maintaining their own personal record of subjective DOM.



I&#039;ve met enough realtors to know that there is plenty of value that they can provide to their clients.  Knowledge of neighborhoods, trends, contract terms, etc. are valuable professional assets.  These areas are where the finesse of a skilled realtor really add value.



But being a gatekeeper for a simple DOM number ?  No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who suggest that it is in the best interest of sellers to reset DOM : if this practice were banned then the playing field would be leveled and there would be no need to play those games that just annoy buyers.  Banning deceptive relisting would bring clarity to the market and would put sellers who have nothing to hide and those that do have something to hide at the same advantage.  Why favor sellers who fool buyers ?  If you&#8217;re interested in a fair market then who&#8217;s interest is it to obscure information and encourage chicanery ?</p>
<p>To those who suggest that the status quo is just fine : just contract a knowledgeable realtor and they will release the &#8220;real&#8221; DOM figure : how does this benefit anyone in the market ?  We&#8217;re just talking about a number.   A number that the sfarmls.com database could easily produce without the need to insert a realtor in the loop.  Certainly good realtors have better use of their time than maintaining their own personal record of subjective DOM.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met enough realtors to know that there is plenty of value that they can provide to their clients.  Knowledge of neighborhoods, trends, contract terms, etc. are valuable professional assets.  These areas are where the finesse of a skilled realtor really add value.</p>
<p>But being a gatekeeper for a simple DOM number ?  No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

