Real Estate Insight, Statistics, Gossip, and News – with a Twist and some Flavor

What a difference 10 years can make

January 8, 2008 – 6:45 pm | by thefrontsteps

Pacific Heights:

Average cost of a single family house: 1997: $1,706,000     2007: $5,022,000

Potrero Hill:

Average cost of a multi unit building:  1997: $412,000        2007: $1,385,000

Schtuff like that.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • Reddit
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Tags: ,

  1. 13 Responses to “What a difference 10 years can make”

  2. By ResortAtSquawCreek on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply

    Got to love inflation, appreciation, and fixed payments. You wake up 2-3 years later and you laugh and lament how cheap things were :)

    How about The Marina and Cow Hollow for SFHs?

    There’s 3-4 feet of new snow here tonight in Tahoe guys! Been here all week. It is AWESOME!

  3. By Sophie on Jan 8, 2008 | Reply

    x 2.95 in pacheights; x 3.36 in potrero hills.

    in the mean time,

    inflation (use of CPI) $1000 in 97 is now $1309 (x 0.31)

    gas went from $1.23/gal to $2.59 (2006) let’s say 2.80 in 2007 (x 2.27)

    etc etc.

    now the REAL question to ask today to our re-newly sworn Gavin: what do you do with an average of 3 times more property taxes than in 1997? is the city 3 times better, are the schools 3 times as good? are the street 3 times as clean? (ok, maybe not 3 if we adjust the wages increase and general cost increase – but still).

    I’m not attacking him, I think he does ok – but the question is still open. When people trade up properties and pay on the new home 3 times as much taxes.. shouldnt they expect MORE from the city than before?

    I do. And I’m happy to get some great value back by enroling my kids in a great public school of the district.

  4. By RSC on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    We need to improve the cities schools. That’s the best use of funds. Spend money on the adults of the future.

  5. By RSC on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    Imagine if SF had a reputation for great schools. Prices would skyrocket even further.

  6. By jamielynn on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    someone here should ENROLL in a spelling and grammar class. LOL

  7. By kenny on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    Almost everyone who communicates on the Internet should enroll in a grammar course! You yourself just started a sentence with a lowercase, used an interior all caps, and finished with an Internet euphemism as an unpunctuated sentence fragment while criticizing another poster. Also, the poster I think you meant to criticize is not a native English speaker.

  8. By james on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    until we go all charter, the public schools are pretty much a lost cause in this town. that or let sylvan run them all for us. i have given up on them. they seem well beyond saving.

  9. By lefty on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    You’re a dork, Kenny.

  10. By kenny on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    I used to be an editor in another life. So yeah, guilty as charged.

  11. By jamielynn on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    what’s really hysterical is how seriously Mr Kenny big time realtor takes my silly comment. Such a proper posting.

    I don’t think he has enuf to do these days, what with the big real estate turndown.

  12. By kenny on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    groan

  13. By Craig on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    I think “anon” has finally assumed a name or two.

  14. By paco on Jan 10, 2008 | Reply

    still some stuff out there that is cheap compared to nyc,london,tokyo or shanghai. and if i were sitting on lots of devaluing dollars i don’t think buying a water view condo in sf would be such a bad use of my money..

Post a Comment