<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investor Alley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Insight, Statistics, Gossip, &#38; News...With a Twist and Some Flavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>After 89 days it goes contingent -- let&#039;s see if it stays in contract.  All i need to do now is prove that the buyer was moved to purchase this property after reading the Front Steps and Investor Alley -- show me my finders fee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 89 days it goes contingent &#8212; let&#8217;s see if it stays in contract.  All i need to do now is prove that the buyer was moved to purchase this property after reading the Front Steps and Investor Alley &#8212; show me my finders fee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomtime</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomtime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Sacramento now in contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacramento now in contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>I like it crew -- I&#039;m from Jersey -- so you can&#039;t just toss the gauntlet out there and not expect me to go get it!



We&#039;ll revisit Investor Alley on Tuesday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it crew &#8212; I&#8217;m from Jersey &#8212; so you can&#8217;t just toss the gauntlet out there and not expect me to go get it!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll revisit Investor Alley on Tuesday afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Greg, that Clay street property is 1M in and 1M out, even by your own example. Follow me -- It sold for north of 4.  It requires a million, or more, to really shine. You&#039;ll likely carry it for a year. Plan for cost overruns. (They always happen, because that&#039;s how subcontractors operate.) Capital gains taxes, property taxes. Realtors. Staging.  Marketing. Certainly you could sell it for 7. How is that not 1M in and 1M out ? I&#039;m talking net, not gross.



I believe in stuff like that, tho, IF and only IF the neighborhood is A+. I think people are making mistakes in Noe Valley right now, along those lines. People are spending BIG for A- or B+  blocks in Noe these days.  It better be pretty spectacular if it&#039;s going to command $3M in Noe Valley. Looking at the location, and the lots, I think there&#039;s some uninformed speculation happening all over Noe.



But back to the Clay example. Don&#039;t get me wrong. A 100 % return on one&#039;s investment inside of a year? That is awesome, any which way you look at it.  But 200 or 300 percent? Again, yes please! Sign me up.



The gauntlet has been thrown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, that Clay street property is 1M in and 1M out, even by your own example. Follow me &#8212; It sold for north of 4.  It requires a million, or more, to really shine. You&#8217;ll likely carry it for a year. Plan for cost overruns. (They always happen, because that&#8217;s how subcontractors operate.) Capital gains taxes, property taxes. Realtors. Staging.  Marketing. Certainly you could sell it for 7. How is that not 1M in and 1M out ? I&#8217;m talking net, not gross.</p>
<p>I believe in stuff like that, tho, IF and only IF the neighborhood is A+. I think people are making mistakes in Noe Valley right now, along those lines. People are spending BIG for A- or B+  blocks in Noe these days.  It better be pretty spectacular if it&#8217;s going to command $3M in Noe Valley. Looking at the location, and the lots, I think there&#8217;s some uninformed speculation happening all over Noe.</p>
<p>But back to the Clay example. Don&#8217;t get me wrong. A 100 % return on one&#8217;s investment inside of a year? That is awesome, any which way you look at it.  But 200 or 300 percent? Again, yes please! Sign me up.</p>
<p>The gauntlet has been thrown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>Alright fellas -- I&#039;ll take the challenge -- give me until Tuesday afternoon when i&#039;ve completed the Broker&#039;s Tour and I&#039;ll find ya a 1M in to get 3M out.  I&#039;m extremely familiar with the complete fixer on Clay St as I had clients make an incredible offer and they didn&#039;t even get a counter.  That house sold for just north of 4M - my clients had planned to put somewhere between 1 and 1.5M into the property.  Upon completion your looking at upwards of 4500sqft on one of the premier blocks in Presidio Ht&#039;s. It&#039;s not absurb to think they could have purchased for 3.5 and get out at 7M.  With a 1.5M renovation they clear 2M.



Again thanks for checking out the post and getting involved - I&#039;ll target some additional properties this weekend and Tuesday and will continue to track the one&#039;s I post.

[&lt;strong&gt;Editor&#039;s note&lt;/strong&gt;: Greg, which one on Clay, so I can link to it for all the others?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright fellas &#8212; I&#8217;ll take the challenge &#8212; give me until Tuesday afternoon when i&#8217;ve completed the Broker&#8217;s Tour and I&#8217;ll find ya a 1M in to get 3M out.  I&#8217;m extremely familiar with the complete fixer on Clay St as I had clients make an incredible offer and they didn&#8217;t even get a counter.  That house sold for just north of 4M &#8211; my clients had planned to put somewhere between 1 and 1.5M into the property.  Upon completion your looking at upwards of 4500sqft on one of the premier blocks in Presidio Ht&#8217;s. It&#8217;s not absurb to think they could have purchased for 3.5 and get out at 7M.  With a 1.5M renovation they clear 2M.</p>
<p>Again thanks for checking out the post and getting involved &#8211; I&#8217;ll target some additional properties this weekend and Tuesday and will continue to track the one&#8217;s I post.</p>
<p>[<strong>Editor's note</strong>: Greg, which one on Clay, so I can link to it for all the others?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomtime</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomtime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>Yes, sign me up for the 1 mil to make 3 mil!  I&#039;ll just get some investors together!  In fact, if you&#039;re serious, perhaps we should team up?  :)



Takes money to make money, that is for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sign me up for the 1 mil to make 3 mil!  I&#8217;ll just get some investors together!  In fact, if you&#8217;re serious, perhaps we should team up?  <img src='http://thefrontsteps.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Takes money to make money, that is for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>1M to make 3M -- in residential ? I&#039;m all ears. Not to be snide. I just don&#039;t think that exists. 1M to gross 2M and net about 1M -- sure. That&#039;s how, say, a big ole fixer on Clay street will project out. But 1M to make 3M -- you&#039;re building condos on an undeveloped piece of land somewhere (not SF) with that equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1M to make 3M &#8212; in residential ? I&#8217;m all ears. Not to be snide. I just don&#8217;t think that exists. 1M to gross 2M and net about 1M &#8212; sure. That&#8217;s how, say, a big ole fixer on Clay street will project out. But 1M to make 3M &#8212; you&#8217;re building condos on an undeveloped piece of land somewhere (not SF) with that equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Boomtime -- GREAT point- I tend to look at investment potential in a property as if I was the one purchasing the property --- and I see 50-100K as a NICE chunk of money which would help me keep my family of 4 in San Francisco.  I will make it a point to pick a variety of properties next week -- some that can be &quot;flipped&quot; with 25K to make 100K -- and some that need 1M in renovation to make 3M when flipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boomtime &#8212; GREAT point- I tend to look at investment potential in a property as if I was the one purchasing the property &#8212; and I see 50-100K as a NICE chunk of money which would help me keep my family of 4 in San Francisco.  I will make it a point to pick a variety of properties next week &#8212; some that can be &#8220;flipped&#8221; with 25K to make 100K &#8212; and some that need 1M in renovation to make 3M when flipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomtime</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomtime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>The issue is, how much is trying to make 100K worth to you?  It all depends on your income.  If you make under 200K....  making 50-100K and paying long term tax of 15% is a very good proposition.  If you make 500K and above, 50-100K doesn&#039;t seem that attractive at all, especially to buy and live b/c you are probably living in a $1.5mil+ place already.



Everything is all relative, and it&#039;s human nature to get accustomed to things really quickly.  The more you make, the more you need to make to bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is, how much is trying to make 100K worth to you?  It all depends on your income.  If you make under 200K&#8230;.  making 50-100K and paying long term tax of 15% is a very good proposition.  If you make 500K and above, 50-100K doesn&#8217;t seem that attractive at all, especially to buy and live b/c you are probably living in a $1.5mil+ place already.</p>
<p>Everything is all relative, and it&#8217;s human nature to get accustomed to things really quickly.  The more you make, the more you need to make to bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Angilly</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Angilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/24/investor-alley/#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>You are dead on -- Glen Park has the benefit of the BART - Noe has the overhead MUNI line.   I spent 2 years riding the # 19 bus in Potrero Hill -- it&#039;s an experience to say the least.



18th St has some great restaurants which are drawing people from all over the city -- but you need to drive.  The upside - tons of parking in Potrero Hill to along with all that sunny weather -- and there&#039;s a good chance you can enjoy a concert in Pac Bell by just opening your window or standing on your roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are dead on &#8212; Glen Park has the benefit of the BART &#8211; Noe has the overhead MUNI line.   I spent 2 years riding the # 19 bus in Potrero Hill &#8212; it&#8217;s an experience to say the least.</p>
<p>18th St has some great restaurants which are drawing people from all over the city &#8212; but you need to drive.  The upside &#8211; tons of parking in Potrero Hill to along with all that sunny weather &#8212; and there&#8217;s a good chance you can enjoy a concert in Pac Bell by just opening your window or standing on your roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

