<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 43 &#38; 56 Forest View Drive: a reader&#8217;s report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/</link>
	<description>San Francisco Real Estate Blog with a Twist and some Flavor</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: condo dweller</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>condo dweller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>funny to see this here... we bid on 56 forest view but were well below the final sale price. it was indeed a lovely (center patio) home. it also had a better floorplan than 43, remodel quality notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny to see this here&#8230; we bid on 56 forest view but were well below the final sale price. it was indeed a lovely (center patio) home. it also had a better floorplan than 43, remodel quality notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HQ</title>
		<link>http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefrontsteps.com/2007/07/09/43-56-forest-view-drive-a-readers-report/#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Pls discuss whether $1.21 mil is good value for the buyer of 56 Forest.  Not familiar with this area.  How does $1.21 mil compare to comps, to historical etc.  Would it have sold for more last yr, or less?
[&lt;strong&gt;Editor's note&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;a href="http://sfarmls.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Sanfrancisco&#38;PRGNAME=MLSLogin&#38;ARGUMENT=zvKJ9efrbFlwqvsrsX5LUvjUleRAgsIWyGdziWmrY5M%3D&#38;KeyRid=1&#38;isPreview=Y" rel="nofollow"&gt;ALL the comps&lt;/a&gt; going back to Jan 10, 2006 so that you can get an idea of price today vs. last year.  To get an idea of the area, check out &lt;a href="http://tdsf.blogspot.com/2007/02/stage-16-lake-shore-3a.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;the tdsf (real estate)&lt;/a&gt;.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pls discuss whether $1.21 mil is good value for the buyer of 56 Forest.  Not familiar with this area.  How does $1.21 mil compare to comps, to historical etc.  Would it have sold for more last yr, or less?<br />
[<strong>Editor's note</strong>: <a href="http://sfarmls.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Sanfrancisco&amp;PRGNAME=MLSLogin&amp;ARGUMENT=zvKJ9efrbFlwqvsrsX5LUvjUleRAgsIWyGdziWmrY5M%3D&amp;KeyRid=1&amp;isPreview=Y" rel="nofollow">ALL the comps</a> going back to Jan 10, 2006 so that you can get an idea of price today vs. last year.  To get an idea of the area, check out <a href="http://tdsf.blogspot.com/2007/02/stage-16-lake-shore-3a.html" rel="nofollow">the tdsf (real estate)</a>.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
